PEG Forum Member Gallery

Patrick Eggle Guitars Forum


IMAG1498.jpg
LA Pro II LA 8-93 61172 viewsStel
010_damage_bottom_back.jpg
Damage to the bottom of the back of the body84 viewstone256
IMAG1501.jpg
LA Pro II LA 8-93 61167 viewsStel
011_damage_low_horn_back.jpg
Damage to the back of the lower horn66 viewstone256
IMAG1506.jpg
LA Pro II LA 8-93 61156 viewsStel
012_damage_top_back.jpg
Damage to the back top edge of the body74 viewstone256
IMAG1509.jpg
LA Pro II LA 8-93 61161 viewsStel
013_damage_top_horn_back.jpg
Damage to the back of the upper horn70 viewstone256
IMAG1510.jpg
LA Pro II LA 8-93 61161 viewsStel
014_srewed_down_trem.jpg
Screwed down vibrato91 viewstone256
014a_adjusted.jpg
Adjusted vibrato92 viewsA new arm was fitted and the vibrato adjusted to work so that the guitar would be assessed properly before restoration.tone256
002a_post_tone_trem.jpg
Set up for proper assessment117 viewsTone control, vibrato arm and new strings so the guitar could be assessed fully before restoration.tone256
016_case_damage_2.jpg
Case internal82 viewsDamage to flap hinge.tone256
0001_leaflet_outer.jpg
Leaflet outer pages105 viewsNote that this says the serial number is LP 793 599 and not LA 7-93 599. This is not only a departure from the standard format at the time, but I assume the LP refers to the Pro whereas LA for Los Angeles would seem to have been the standard. Furthermore, the date of manufacture is given as 19th August, whereas received wisdom is that "7-93" would indicate July. Not in any way important, but interesting in that it suggests a factory time lag.tone256
0002_leaflet_inner.jpg
Leaflet inner pagers80 viewstone256
     
33 files on 2 page(s) 2